Host Baba Nedir

We say we want to lose weight, but then we neglect our bodies with poor exercise and nutrition practices. We say we want a love-filled relationship, but return time and time again to the person who makes us feel unwanted. We say we want that promotion at work, but we constantly show up late and do the bare minimum required of us. Deep down, we know the steps we could take to accomplish our goals, but there’s something preventing us from committing. Consider that the issue is not a logical one, but rather an emotional one. We continue behaviors that we know are counterproductive because of an ego-driven need to fill a hole in our self-perception and other unconscious beliefs and motivations.

Below, find three reasons we might sabotage our own success and happiness:

Self-Sabotage Explanation #1: Fear of Failure

The fear of failure is something many people can identify with. At first, it seems counterintuitive—if you truly feared failing, why would you sabotage your efforts toward success? Wouldn’t you do everything in your power to make sure you succeeded? On a logical level, that makes sense. The unconscious ego, however, is often illogical and preys upon any instability of emotions and our self-concept to carry out its fear-based agenda.

At the end of the day, the ego’s agenda is to protect you from perceived threats to your happiness. In this instance, failure is the threat to your self-worth, and so your ego does everything within its power to protect you from the experience of failing or being rejected.

The ego will recruit excuses, thoughts of self-deprecation, and procrastination to keep you from trying your hardest and giving your all. This is because if you don’t try, you can’t fail, and if you don’t fail, you don’t feel the pain that accompanies failure. It’s a warped cycle, but the fear of failure is just one example of how we undermine our own desires for success.

Self-Sabotage Explanation #2: Fear of Success

On the flip side, many people harbor an intense fear of success. Again, this seems odd: why would one be afraid to succeed or to win? Isn’t that a positive thing?

Of course, on a surface level, success sounds exciting. Sometimes, however, we are subconsciously terrified of all the effort, change, and discomfort we’ll have to put ourselves through in order to reach our goals. We may even fear becoming expansive or overshadowing our families or friends out of fear we will wound them, or incite their envy.

We may want the success, but we don’t necessarily want the road it takes to get there. We worry that we won’t be able to sustain the lifestyle we have to build on the way to achievement. Even when we are doing well, we feel that we are imposters and that our success will be short-lived once everyone discovers who we “really” are. This belief is also known as “imposter-syndrome.” The fear of success is ultimately a fear of not being good enough for the greatness to which we aspire. Just like the fear of failure, it is a self-protective mechanism that actually harms more than it helps. The ego has done its job, and yet, we are still unhappy because we are dimming our own light by doubting our abilities.

Self-Sabotage Explanation #3: Lack of Self-Worth

In both of the previous examples, self-sabotage stems from low confidence or warped beliefs about one’s abilities.

Some people, however, have such low self-regard for themselves that they don’t even believe they deserve the things they desire. This has less to do with a lack of faith in capabilities, and more to do with a shattered sense of self-worth. Perhaps they have experienced some form of trauma that severed their connection to their true nature, which is the essence of light, love, and expansive capacities and possibilities.

This person might believe themselves to be inherently “bad,” and thus undeserving of the good things life has to offer, including love, respect, and financial resources. A person in this position may sabotage relationships by refusing to let anyone get close enough to love them, or living in isolation. Severely depressed or individuals in crisis have often convinced themselves that their friends and family members would actually be better off without them around, because that is how little value they place on themselves.

When we observe self-sabotaging behaviors in our loved ones, it can be extremely difficult to witness. We are confused and question their logic and motives, wondering why they continue to return to people and situations that cause them pain and further damage their self-esteem. We may not be understanding, however, that the issue runs far deeper than logic would dictate. The wife who refuses to leave her abusive husband, the yo-yo dieter who can’t seem to stick to his healthy lifestyle plan, the disgruntled worker who bounces from job to job—they don’t want to be miserable, but they may be unconsciously (or unknowingly) sabotaging their own chance to be happy.

While self-sabotage is a dangerous cycle, it does not have to be permanent and you can break free. In fact, self-sabotage can be remedied by increasing self-awareness through intense and purposeful self-work and personal development. Therapy or counseling can be a wonderful tool to exposing the roots behind negative behaviors and developing healthy alternatives to return you to a more fulfilling life, which is what life intends for you.

DO YOU THINK YOU MIGHT BE SABOTAGING YOUR OWN HAPPINESS? HAVE YOU IDENTIFIED COUNTERPRODUCTIVE TENDENCIES WITHIN YOUR WORK OR RELATIONSHIP HABITS? Call Dr. Logan at 646.798.8354.

Dr. Logan Jones is a licensed psychologist in NYC. If you are looking to develop higher confidence, or if you’re a creative person struggling with personal accountability, he offers one-on-one sessions to uncover your mental blockages and help set you on the path to success.

I am using vmware Workstation 10 on a Gentoo linux laptop with kernel 3.14 and KDE-4.13. Guest is Windows 7 Professional 64bit.

Unity mode has always been working perfectly well and smooth, no matter whether I start the Workstation using the integrated Intel HD

chip (no 3D acceleration) or on the nvidia card (using primusrun enabling 3D acceleration).

The Microsoft Performance Index is 5.7.

However, while Visual Studio 2010 worked perfectly well, VS 2013 causes a full freeze. The window appears as 5(!!) windows in KDE

with four being just "Border" bars. Whenever I try to move the main window, the top bar gets moved instead and freezes after a few pixels

movement. The whole desktop does no longer respond then.

However, conky reports vmware-vmx to be at around ~5% cpu, not changing much up or down.

I have to switch to a root console and suspend the machine using vmrun to get out of this situation again.

It does not seem to matter whether Aero is turned on or off, or whether I start Windows with or without 3D acceleration or use KDE with

XRender, OpenGL 2.0 or OpenGL 3.1.

I first suspected the ugly new UI design of Microsoft applications, but MS Office 2013 works just perfect in unity mode. It is *only*

Visual Studio 2013 that is misbehaving.

Attached is a screenshot *before* the freeze, obviously I can't make one during the freeze.

Has anybody ever experienced this and/or can suggest anything that can fix this?

Thanks in advance

Yamakuzure

Message was edited by: Yamakuzure Changed screenshots, accidently uploaded a wrong one.

Understanding the world and Humanity changes due the Globalization phenomenon allows to identify the special conditions created that promote the implementation and the dissemination of the International Organized Criminality, in short time, affecting the International Community in all dimensions. As one of the most serious threats to the Rule of Law, violating the national legal systems and the International Law, being especially dangerous to the states and human lives in a global context. The International, regional and (most of) national juridical and judicial systems recognize the International Organized Criminality as a emergent problem that needs to be in the top of the political agenda and of the action by the Institutions aiming to prevent and fight their evolution, their dangerous damages and consequences to all their target – human and institutional. Although all difficult but effective legal, political, economic, and social work in this fight, mainly by the United Nations in cooperation with International Organizations and States, the Council of Europe assumed their responsibility to protect their State Members, their citizens, and the rest of the world by inherence. There is an enormous political and legal work, with a straight position based on their main structure document, the European Convention on Human Rights, but with the specialized work teams, understanded as need in each case. Consequently, the Council of Europe has a continuous production of legislation and management of procedures and activities, as well as International political and governance diplomatic relations in networks, in compliance with the International Law facing the challenge that context obliges permanently. Since 1959, with the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, the strategic action promoted is the multidimensional International Cooperation between all “actors” in the International Community, preventing the violation of the International Law, generated conditions to apply the International Penal Law and developing policymaking articulated with the real contexts and needs. Within International Community, the Cooperation is the best key to join procedures to transcend the difficulties and constraints to achieve to the prevention and fight against the International Organized Criminality. This scientific research is being developed based on juridical, criminal, and political methodology, mainly qualitative, but presenting statistic data to demonstrate the results discussed.

Bu çalışmada girişimci, girişimcilik ve kişilik kavramlarına değinilmiş olup, girişimciler ile maaşlı çalışanlar arasında kişilik özellikleri bağlamında bir fark olup olmadığı incelenmiştir. Çalışmada, Gençöz ve Öncül (2012)’nin Türk kültürüne yönelik geliştirdiği ve 45 maddeden oluşan “Temel Kişilik Özellikleri” ölçeğinden yararlanılarak bir anket formu hazırlanmıştır. Hazırlanan anket formu, 1 Kasım-15 Aralık 2016 tarihleri arasında, Çanakkale il merkezinde yer alan 450 girişimci ve maaşlı çalışana yüz yüze görüşme yöntemi aracılığıyla uygulanmıştır. Girişimciler ile maaşlı çalışanların kişilik özellikleri arasındaki farklılıklar, T-testi ve Anova testleri aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda girişimci – maaşlı çalışanların kişilik özellikleri bakımından yaş, medeni durum, gelir seviyesi ve iş durumuna göre, “Dışadönüklük”, “Sorumluluk”, “Uyumluluk”, “Duygusal Tutarsızlık”, “Gelişime Açıklık” ve “Olumsuz Değerlik” boyutları arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Girişimciler ile maaşlı çalışanların kişilik özellikleri arasındaki farklılıklar cinsiyet değişkenine göre incelendiğinde ise, “Sorumluluk” ve “Uyumluluk” boyutlarında anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu; kadınların erkeklere göre daha fazla sorumluk sahibi ve uyumlu oldukları sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Girişimciler ile maaşlı çalışanların kişilik özellikleri arasındaki farklılıklar eğitim değişkenine göre incelendiğinde ise, “Duygusal Tutarsızlık” boyutunda ilköğretim–lise ve lise–ilköğretim eğitim seviyeleri arasında farklılık olduğu; lise eğitim seviyesine sahip girişimci ve maaşlı çalışanların, eğitim seviyesi ilköğretim olanlara göre daha fazla duygusal tutarsızlığa sahip oldukları görülmüştür. Türk kültürüne yönelik olarak geliştirilen “Temel Kişilik Özellikleri” ölçeğinden yararlanılarak gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmanın sonuçlarının literatüre katkı sağlayacağı ve ileride konu ile ilgili yapılacak çalışmalarda yol gösterici olacağı düşünülmektedir. In this study, the concepts of entrepreneur, entrepreneurship and personality are mentioned and also it has been examined whether there is a difference between entrepreneurs and salaried employees in terms of their personality traits. A questionnaire form was prepared by using the "Basic Personality Features" scale developed by Gençöz and Öncül (2012) for Turkish culture and consisting of 45 items for the study. The prepared questionnaire was applied between 1 November and 15 December 2016 through 450 entrepreneurs and salaried employees, faceto-face interviewing methods in Canakkale province center. Differences between personality traits of entrepreneurs and salaried employees were analyzed through the t-test and Anova tests. As a result of the study, it is determined that there is no difference between the dimensions of "Outwardness", "Responsibility", "Compatibility", "Emotional Inconsistency", "Developmental Clarity" and "Negative Validity" according to age, marital status, income level and employment status of entrepreneurs and salaried employees. When the differences between personality traits of entrepreneurs and salaried employees are examined according to gender variable, it is seen that there is a meaningful difference between "Responsibility" and "Compatibility" dimensions. According to this difference, women are more responsible and accountable than men. When the differences between personality traits of entrepreneurs and salaried employees are examined according to educational variables, it is found that there is a difference between primary and high school and primary school education levels in the dimension of "Emotional inconsistency". Entrepreneurs and salaried employees with a high school education level are found to have more emotional inconsistency than those with an education level of primary education. It is considered that the results of this study, which is realized by using the "Basic Personality Traits" scale developed for the Turkish culture, will contribute to the literature and will be a guide for the future studies about this subject.