Nurettin Demir Hacettepe

Bütün Yazıları

Prof. Dr. Nurettin Demir

Prof. Dr. Nurettin Demir Kimdir? yılında Selçuk Üniversitesinden mezun oldu. MEB bursu ile Johannes Gutenberg Universitesi, Mainz&#;de doktorasını yaptı. Anadal: Türkoloji, Yan Dallar: Doğu Dilleri, İslami İlimler, &#;da Doçent, &#;da profesör oldu. József Attila Universitesi, Altaistik Bölümü&#;nde okutman, Leipzig, Üniversitesi, Orientalistik Bölümünde Türkçe ve Farsça Sorumlusu öğretim elemanı, Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi ve Başkent Üniversitesinde çalıştı. Uppsala Üniversitesi, Africa ve Asya Dilleri Bölümü&#;nde, MİNZU Üniversitesinde ve Alfarabi Üniversitesinde misafir öğretim üyesi olarak çalıştı. yılından bu yana Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Çağdaş Türk Lehçeleri ve Edebiyatları bölümünde görev yapmaktadır. İlgi Alanları: Genel Türkoloji, Türk Dünyası, Türk Dil ve Lehçeleri, Ağız araştırmaları, Türkiye Türkçesi Dilbilgisi, Dilbilim, Dil Dokümantasyonu, Eski Anadolu Türkçesi, Sosyolinguistik, Dil Politikası, Dil İlişkileri, Çeviri, Kültür Aratırmaları, dil kültür ilişkisi Favori Müzikler: Etno Jazz (Jan Garbarek ile birlikte çalanlar), Türk Halk Müziği, Sanat Müziği, Batı Klasikleri Dünya Müzikleri

It is a feature that is constantly emphasized in classical and contemporary linguistic theories, such as the theory of L. Tesniéré's Dependency Grammar and the theory of N. Chomsky's Government and Binding, that verb as a morpheme and sentence fragment are at the center of human communication. In a similar way, studies conducted in the field of traditional Turkology are regarded as the most important unit of verb and therefore predicate communication. Similarly, studies conducted in the field of traditional Turkology are regarded as the most important unit of communication are verb and therefore predicate. In spite of this importance, if the verbs does not relate to itself in terms of time, space, condition, condition, style, etc. in an open or implicit manner, it can not be a part of the grammar, it remains an abstract member of the abstract world. In Turkish and Turkic, these relations are often established by adverbs, and when this relationship is established, the adverbs become a syntactic form which is no longer merely a morpheme. Gerunds (-ınca, -ıp, -arak etc.), one of the morpho-syntactic categories that are specific to the Turkic languages, provide that clauses to become grammaticalized by the function of the envelope. This study has focused on these morpho-syntactic units in general and the following questions were sought during the study: Is the gerunds that shows an internal structure / grammar characteristic as stable as other internal structure components? If we leave the phonetic variations to an edge, is it always the same or similar gerunds used at every turn and stage in Turkish history? If there is a dynamism in the use of these suffixes in Turkish, what are the reasons for this? How are new gerunds produced in Turkic languages, how do new gerund structures come into being? Are there similarities in production processes? Will the gerunds lose prestige over time? The database of the study will create the gerunds lists in the grammar books prepared on Turkic languages such as Turkish, Azerbaijani, Kazan Tatar, Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Uzbek, Uigur, Tuvan, Yakut, Chuvash and will be related to the dialects as needed.